Wednesday, December 18

Study Observes the Interactions Between Live Fish and Fish-like Robots

by Ingrid Fadelli , Tech Xplore

Study observes the interactions between live fish and fish-like robots
Relationship between attraction ratio and Er. The figure shows the relationship between the attraction ratio and the relative kinetic energy Er of the robotic fish when interaction occurs. It can be observed that there is a significant negative correlation between the attraction ratio and the relative kinetic energy, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient is ρ = −0.535 with a P value of p = 0.000001. This suggests that when the relative kinetic energy of robotic fish increases, the trend of fish actively approaching robotic fish is decreasing. Credit: Zhou et al

In recent decades, engineers have created a wide range of robotic systems inspired by animals, including four legged robots, as well as systems inspired by snakes, insects, squid and fish. Studies exploring the interactions between these robots and their biological counterparts, however, as still relatively rare.

Researchers at Peking University and China Agricultural University recently set out to explore what happens when live fish are placed in the same environment as a robotic fish. Their findings, published in Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, could both inform the development of fish-inspired robots and shed some new light on the behavior of real fish.

“Our research team has been focusing on the development of self-propelled robotic fish for a considerable amount of time,” Dr. Junzhi Yu, one of the researchers who carried out the study, told Tech Xplore. “During our field experiments, we observed an exciting phenomenon where live fish were observed following the swimming robotic fish. We are eager to further explore the underlying principles behind this phenomenon and gain a deeper understanding of this ‘fish following’ behavior.”

The key objective of the recent work by Dr. Yu and his colleagues was to gather new insight about how fish interact with the fish-like robots developed by their lab, as this could benefit both the robotics and biology research communities. The robotic fish used in their experiments was carefully designed to replicate the appearance, body shape, and movements of koi fish, large and colorful freshwater fish originating from Eastern Asia.

Study observes the interactions between live fish and fish-like robots
Relationship between attraction ratio and Sr. The figure shows the relationship between the attraction ratio and the Strouhal number of the robotic fish when interaction occurs is illustrated. It can be observed that when the Strouhal number Sr is less than 1.95, there is a negative correlation between the attraction ratio and the Strouhal number, with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of ρ = −0.266 and a P value of p = 0.033. When the Strouhal number is greater than 1.95, there is a jump step in the attraction ratio, which directly jumps to a higher level of 0.4 to 0.6. This suggests that fish are more attracted to robotic fish when the robotic fish swims at high frequency and low speed (smaller swing amplitude). Additionally, at the same frequency, the higher the Strouhal number, the lower the swimming speed, and the higher the Attraction ratio. Credit: Zhou et al

“Using the central pattern generator (CPG) model, we have developed a control system that generates rhythm signals for the oscillations of our system’s two concatenated joints,” Dr. Yu explained. “These signals drive the flexible caudal fin to swing, and produce anti-Karman vortex street, which enables our robotic fish to achieve a body-caudal fin (BCF) motion similar to that of koi fish. This design allows our robotic fish to self-propelled swim efficiently, making it an ideal tool for studying fish behavior.”

In their experiments, Dr. Yu and his colleagues placed one or two prototypes of their koi fish-like robot in the same tank with one or more live fishes. They then observed how the fish behaved in the presence of this robot and assessed whether their behavior varied based on how many other live fish were present in the tank with them.

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0536483524803400&output=html&h=280&slotname=8459827939&adk=1069712709&adf=1897700409&pi=t.ma~as.8459827939&w=540&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1683970961&rafmt=1&format=540×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechxplore.com%2Fnews%2F2023-05-interactions-fish-fish-like-robots.html&fwr=0&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTAuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTEzLjAuNTY3Mi42MyIsW10sMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siR29vZ2xlIENocm9tZSIsIjExMy4wLjU2NzIuNjMiXSxbIkNocm9taXVtIiwiMTEzLjAuNTY3Mi42MyJdLFsiTm90LUEuQnJhbmQiLCIyNC4wLjAuMCJdXSwxXQ..&dt=1683970941254&bpp=2&bdt=7317&idt=7544&shv=r20230510&mjsv=m202305090101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3Deeefbc58de360b92-2260795deddc0023%3AT%3D1683970945%3ART%3D1683970951%3AS%3DALNI_Mb7b8SRkUCAiGuc5lEQ24viJbFXkg&gpic=UID%3D00000c153889f692%3AT%3D1683970945%3ART%3D1683970945%3AS%3DALNI_MbwxJyudYcC0_arWOmCxaa7khxYIg&prev_fmts=0x0%2C1349x695&nras=2&correlator=3635065514623&frm=20&pv=1&ga_vid=1375430391.1683970926&ga_sid=1683970946&ga_hid=811803162&ga_fc=1&u_tz=60&u_his=4&u_h=768&u_w=1366&u_ah=768&u_aw=1366&u_cd=24&u_sd=1&dmc=8&adx=310&ady=2368&biw=1349&bih=695&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=44759926%2C44773810%2C44759837%2C44759875%2C31074469%2C44785294%2C44788441%2C44789923%2C44789820&oid=2&pvsid=948598663466711&tmod=1301123610&uas=1&nvt=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Ftechxplore.com%2Fengineering-news%2F&fc=1920&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1366%2C0%2C1366%2C768%2C1366%2C695&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7ClEbr%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=128&bc=31&ifi=2&uci=a!2&btvi=1&fsb=1&xpc=TnXrpJXovS&p=https%3A//techxplore.com&dtd=20077

“The most notable achievement of our study is the analysis of experiments on quantity variation and parameter variation,” Dr. Yu said. “Through extensive experimentation, we discovered that live fish exhibit significantly lower proactivity when alone, and the most proactive case is one where a robotic fish is interacting with two real fish. In addition, our experiments on parameter variation indicated that live fish may respond more proactively to robotic fish that swim with high frequency and low amplitude, but they may also move together with the robotic fish at high frequency and high amplitude.”

The researchers’ observations shed an interesting new light on the collective behavior of fish, which could potentially guide the design of additional fish-like robots. Their work could also inspire other teams to explore the interactions between live animals and their robotic counterparts. This could in turn help to better understand the social behavior of these animals and how they would respond to robots if they were eventually introduced in their environment.

“One promising direction for the further development of robotic fish is the use of flexible materials such as dielectric elastomer to create silent and vibration-free propulsion technology,” Dr. Yu added. “This will enable us to achieve a higher level of bionic interaction between robotic fish and real fish, opening new possibilities for studying aquatic environments and marine life. With continued research and development in this area, we hope to develop some commercial products for interactive demonstrations.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *